Factbites
 Where results make sense
About us   |   Why use us?   |   Reviews   |   PR   |   Contact us  

Topic: Post processualism


Related Topics

In the News (Mon 14 Dec 09)

  
  Post-processualism: Definition and Links by Encyclopedian.com
While Processual archaeologists had, if not a “codified” theory to unify them, then at least a common overall goal and spirit that drove them: scientific archaeology.
As a group, they are only unified by their critique of Processualism, which they consider a positivist outlook on culture.
Postproccessualism is not popular in America, where Processualism was born and continues to be the main focus of archaeology.
www.encyclopedian.com /po/Post-processualism.html   (892 words)

  
 Archaeolog: A comment on “What comes after Post-processualism???”
Processualism and post-processualism: the powers of the paradigm, manifold as they are, add to the persistence of these terms.
Historical though they may be, processualism and post-processualism have become terms of ease and convenience for our understanding of such a variegated terrain, a terrain largely oriented around a schism (with ‘historical’ insert ‘abandoned,’ as who exclusively ascribes to their core tenants (cf.
To affix the ‘post’ is to attempt to have the next word (which is never the last word) while endeavoring to cast that which came before to the wayside.
traumwerk.stanford.edu /archaeolog/2007/06/a_comment_on_what_comes_after.html   (1109 words)

  
  Post-processualism
While Processual archaeologists had, if not a “codified” theory to unify them, then at least a common overall goal and spirit that drove them: scientific archaeology.
As a group, they are only unified by their critique of Processualism, which they consider a positivist outlook on culture.
Postproccessualism is not popular in America, where Processualism was born and continues to be the main focus of archaeology.
www.ebroadcast.com.au /lookup/encyclopedia/po/Post_processualism.html   (855 words)

  
 Definition of Post-processualism
Processual archaeologists had, if not a single theoretical position to unify them, then at least a common aspiration that drove them: the construction of a scientific and comparative archaeology.
This diversity was unified, however, by a critique of Processualism, which was painted as positivist outlook on culture.
Postprocessualism is not popular in America, where Processualism was born and continues to be the main focus of archaeology, though it has made major gains in "liberal" universities.
www.wordiq.com /definition/Post-processualism   (882 words)

  
 The Path to a Scientific Archaeology
These "new" or "processual" archaeologists saw archaeology as a social science that should have for its "…ultimate purpose the discovery of regularities that are in a sense spaceless and timeless" (Willey and Phillips 1958: 2), rather than a historical purpose of extending the border between history and prehistory further into the past.
Processual archaeologists felt that the traditional archaeology being practiced at the time did not satisfactorily explain from where their conclusions from their data came, and that some of the procedures used to interpret evidence were not valid.
Basically, processual archaeologists became so obsessed by the need for an axiomatized archaeological theory, that they did not realize that they only needed to make their line of reasoning in drawing conclusions from data explicit in order to be considered "scientific".
www.modernhumanorigins.net /anth623.html   (10057 words)

  
 Post-processual archaeology - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Processual archaeologists had, if not a single theoretical position to unify them, then at least a common aspiration that drove them: the construction of a scientific and comparative archaeology.
This diversity was unified, however, by a critique of Processualism, which was painted as positivist outlook on culture.
The first is an engagement with postmodernism, its parent theory, the second is its emergence from processual archaeology (Hodder, 1986).
en.wikipedia.org /wiki/Post-processualism   (840 words)

  
 Archaeolog
After one paper I made a comment that I did not find very original at the time, but I received so many reactions even after returning home that I am now thinking it may be worth considering this question again on this blog.
The speaker had framed his talk by the dualism of ‘processualism’ and ‘post-processualism’, suggesting a way of finally overcoming this long-standing division.
Most of the heritage professionals so far favour to retain the grey GDR building that was erected in 1956 in its place as a historic witness in its own right.
archaeolog.org   (3127 words)

  
 currenttrends
Processual archaeology, a complex development in materialism, with many theorists and advocates, argued for a new recognition of the taphonomic processes in archaeology.
According to post- processual archaeological theory, the same phenomenon of a multiplicity of meanings for objects, was also true of the makers of the material culture, who if they were here today to ask would give different contextual meanings or readings of the objects that they had made.
Feminist archaeologists looked at processualism and began asking the question: "Where are the women?" (Conkey 1984, Tringham 1994) Post-processual archaeology, as expounded by Hodder (1986: 156-60), did recognize the contributions of processual archaeology in encouraging the idea that culture is adaptive and for incorporating systems theory, information exchange theory and the importance of environmental theory.
www.tc.umn.edu /~call0031/chapter1.html   (4242 words)

  
 Processual archaeology - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Processual archaeology is a form of archaeological theory which arguably had its genesis in 1958 with Willey and Phillips' work, Method and Theory in American Archeology in which the pair stated that "American archeology is anthropology or it is nothing" (Willey and Phillips, 1958:2).
The result of this is that Processual archaeologists propose that cultural change happens in a predictable framework and seek to understand it by the analysis of its components.
What this all means to Processual archaeologists is that cultural changes are driven by evolutionary "processes" in cultural development, which will be adaptive relative to the environment and therefore not only understandable, but also scientifically predictable once the interaction of the variables is understood.
en.wikipedia.org /wiki/Processualism   (915 words)

  
 Archaeology
processualism) tend to describe the underlying systems, trying to find common ground between cultures and themes in cultural development; other schools (post-processualism) either believe this impossible or fraught with difficulty, and so examine archaeology in a certain cultural context.
The "New Archaeology[?]" proposed by Lewis Binford and others during the 1960s, challenged the traditional Euro-centric view of archaeology and the popular conception of it as being the province of historians, advocating the processual model which would lead archaeologists to look at discoveries in a new way.
Post processualism - a relativistic approach to culture.
www.ebroadcast.com.au /lookup/encyclopedia/ar/Archaeologist.html   (1625 words)

  
 D. bailey - Trends in interpretation   (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-10-26)
This is because processualism threatens both the culture historical approach and, perhaps more importantly, the control of knowledge and interpretation which lies at the heart of ideological archaeology.
One of the fundamental advances of processual archaeology was its demand for, and provision of, explicit, objective standards for evaluating archaeological interpretation.
While it is clear that a processual approach to archaeology is incompatible with ideological archaeology because the former threatens the existence of the latter, the absence of processualist archaeology in Bulgaria makes sense for another reason.
knigite.abv.bg /en/db/bailey_trends.html   (1136 words)

  
 D. bailey - Trends in interpretation
This is because processualism threatens both the culture historical approach and, perhaps more importantly, the control of knowledge and interpretation which lies at the heart of ideological archaeology.
One of the fundamental advances of processual archaeology was its demand for, and provision of, explicit, objective standards for evaluating archaeological interpretation.
While it is clear that a processual approach to archaeology is incompatible with ideological archaeology because the former threatens the existence of the latter, the absence of processualist archaeology in Bulgaria makes sense for another reason.
www.kroraina.com /knigi/en/db/bailey_trends.html   (1136 words)

  
 [No title]   (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-10-26)
Processual archaeology explicitly associates itself with the generalizing social sciences, such as economics, political science, sociology, and ethnology.
The post-processualist school argued against the line adopted by Binford and the processualists, stating that "processual archaeology has not paid sufficient attention to its object of inquiry, to the implications of its theoretical and methodological foundations, or to the context in which archaeological research was carried out" (Patterson 1990: 191).
Reversing the adaptive stance of processual archaeology, the post-processual critique is based on a mentalist (emic) view of culture, emphasizing the role of artifacts as important symbols of social interaction.
www.ltcconline.net /lukas/handouts/postprocess.ppt   (2100 words)

  
 Archaeolog: "What comes after Post-processualism???"
Promptly they were asked about their view of the currency of ‘processual’ and ‘post-processual’ approaches in the UK today.
It became clear that the terms were still around but that their meaning had shifted somewhat.
In my experience, the sciences have made enormous progress with the processual paradigm, now moving into the "sciences of complexity," multiple agency (i.e.
traumwerk.stanford.edu /archaeolog/2007/06/what_comes_after_postprocessua.html   (1471 words)

  
 Archaeology - duno.com reference
Gordon Willey pioneered the technique of regional settlement pattern survey in 1949 in the Viru Valley of coastal Peru, and survey of all levels became prominent with the rise of processual archaeology some years later.
It questioned processualism's appeals to science and impartiality and emphasised the importance of relativism, becoming known as post-processual archaeology.
Many non-fiction authors have ignored the scientific methods of processual archaeology, or the specific critiques of it contained in post-processualism.
www.duno.com /term/Archaeology   (7962 words)

  
 anthropologist: Processualism vs. Post-Processualism
A few days ago in a restaurant a friend and I were having a talk about post-processualism and processualism.
I explained that I was more sympathetic to processualism, although had issues with it, and also found certain aspects of post-processualism important to keep in mind.
Post-processualism argues is that processualism yields the research results that were anticipated prior to beginning a study.
community.livejournal.com /anthropologist/1041983.html   (1745 words)

  
 Wikinfo | Archaeology   (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-10-26)
processualism) tend to describe the underlying systems, trying to find common ground between cultures and themes in cultural development; other schools (post-processualism) either believe this impossible or fraught with difficulty, and so focus on the social meaning and use of material culture within its specific cultural context.
The first major phase in the history of archaeological theory is commonly referred to as Culture History, or the ordering of artifacts and by inference cultures in time and place.
The current major phase of archaeology is sometimes referred to as "Post-Processual" archaeology, or an opening up of archaeological theory and inquiry to include the topics from the other disciplines of the social sciences, philosophy, and even art and literature.
www.wikinfo.org /wiki.php?title=Archaeology   (2120 words)

  
 Archaeology - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia   (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-10-26)
Cryptoarchaeology is the scientific study of historic or prehistoric peoples and their cultures by analysis of their artifacts, inscriptions, monuments, and other such remains that do not adhere to orthodox theory and thought.
However, it rigorously adheres to the fundamental principals of processual Archaeology.
Archaeologyfieldwork.com - Archaeology employment listings, resume and cv postings, cultural resource management firms throughout the world, volunteer opportunities, field schools, internships, photos, discussion forums, and other resources for those in the internet archaeological community.
work-pro.net /cgi-bin/cgiproxy/nph-proxy.pl/000110A/687474702s656r2r77696o6970656469612r6s72672s77696o692s4172636861656s6p6s6779   (5602 words)

  
 Antiquity, Reviews: Hunter-gatherers 'on the move'?
The concept of direct historical analogy seems to combine elements both of processual views of the determining effects of the environment and Sollasian views of culture history.
Both processualism and post-processualism produce their fair share of both careful and careless archaeologists.
Analogy in post-processualism, in fact, works in a similar way to modelling in processualism, in that both can encourage careless interpretation of material evidence and the generation of banal truisms.
antiquity.ac.uk /reviews/conneller.html   (3409 words)

  
 Theory and World Archaeology: Italy (Part 1)
He argued that archaeology of broadly processual type has taken root in Italy, although restricted in the main to groups of scholars working in Rome and the Veneto.
Further reasons can be adduced, including those that have militated against the development of archaeological theory of any kind, such as the dominance of classical and historical traditions in archaeology, at the expense of anthropology and other social sciences.
While it is unlikely, and undesirable, that Italian archaeology will simply follow the British journey from processualism to post-processualism, there are other possible approaches and new areas of study, including the symbolic/cognitive and social/political realms addressed by post-processualism.
csweb.bournemouth.ac.uk /tag97/italy_1.htm   (1636 words)

  
 Theory and World Archaeology: Italy (Part 1)
He argued that archaeology of broadly processual type has taken root in Italy, although restricted in the main to groups of scholars working in Rome and the Veneto.
Further reasons can be adduced, including those that have militated against the development of archaeological theory of any kind, such as the dominance of classical and historical traditions in archaeology, at the expense of anthropology and other social sciences.
While it is unlikely, and undesirable, that Italian archaeology will simply follow the British journey from processualism to post-processualism, there are other possible approaches and new areas of study, including the symbolic/cognitive and social/political realms addressed by post-processualism.
csweb.bmth.ac.uk /tag97/italy_1.htm   (1636 words)

  
 American University of Sharjah
The hope is that researchers will be able to employ various techniques from a combined social sciences tool kit to answer specific questions of society in the Gulf.
The American University of Sharjah and the Sociological Association are indeed fortunate to bring together seminal thinkers in the five social disciplines with breadth of experience in applying social theory to assess the directions of a post disciplinary social science, with the United Arab Emirates as the case study.
This country is among the most innovative and fastest growing social nodes of the new global order.
www.aus.edu /conferences/isc/about.php   (544 words)

  
 Postprocessual archaeology
For a snapshot of the kind of work that archaeological approaches that actually consider gender can produce, follow this link for an on-line version of an edited volume, Exploring Gender Through Archaeology (ed.
In response to some of the valid criticisms of ‘New Archaeology’, Colin Renfrew developed what he has coined ‘Cognitive Processualism’.
Renfrew has been actively involved in archaeological theory of one type of another for over 3 decades, sometimes at the core, other times at the periphery.
www.gla.ac.uk /archaeology/resources/theory/postprocessual.html   (401 words)

  
 Why fascists donít like ªpost-processualism´
Paul Feyerabend once remarked that ìexperts frequently do not know what they are talking about and ëscholarly opinioní, more often than not, is but uninformed gossipî (1987: 16).
It has, for instance, long been a common place for archaeologists associated with ªprocessual´ approaches to accuse, rightly or wrongly, those associated with ªpost-processual´ approaches of attacking caricatures and straw persons which believe in a rigid scientism that is not held by anyone, in reality.
However, many of the critics of post-processualism can be charged with a similar offence: these critics accuse post-processualists of a relativism which they have never believed in.
www.assemblage.group.shef.ac.uk /1/holtorf.html   (1961 words)

  
 Pearson, James L. Shamanism and the Ancient Mind: a Cognitive Approach to Archaeology - Book Review International ...
Contextualizing the cognitive approach, the first half of the text provides a concise history of related archaeological methodologies, and their differing approaches to anthropology.
This should be very useful for the novice seeking a grasp of the processual versus post-processual debate, in the context of anthropological archaeology.
In the second half, Pearson outlines the history of rock-art research internationally and in the Americas with the goal of debunking earlier theoretical interpretations (art for art's sake, totemism, hunting magic, and structuralism) before setting up a shamanistic interpretation based on neuropsychology and ethnography.
findarticles.com /p/articles/mi_m0IMR/is_3-4_79/ai_113139436   (892 words)

  
 Purse Lip Square Jaw: Archaeological futures (Pt. 1)
In other words, there was a disconnect between the objects of study and their role in creating and performing culture, including how they are used by archaeologists and others, in the present, to (re)create the past.
I heard all sorts of talk about human-centred technology, assumed a committment to understanding the complex relations between people and objects, and thought that I would finally be able to put my archaeological knowledge to good use.
I am still frustrated by the idea that technological objects are seen to be neutral, or that their meaning is only activated by (end) use.
www.purselipsquarejaw.org /2005/02/archaeological-futures-pt-1.php   (584 words)

Try your search on: Qwika (all wikis)

Factbites
  About us   |   Why use us?   |   Reviews   |   Press   |   Contact us  
Copyright © 2005-2007 www.factbites.com Usage implies agreement with terms.