| |
| | [No title] |
 | | In Postal Service, supra at 335, the Board said that this purpose was to guarantee postal unions at least a certain level of predictability of dues income. |
 | | Notwithstanding the unequivocal statements in Postal Service, 302 NLRB 332 (1991), as to the irrevocability of checkoff authorizations, I read section 1205(a) as assuming that the union maintains its exclusive representative status with respect to both the unit in general and the employees in particular. |
 | | Postal Service, supra, is distinguishable because the employee, notwithstanding his resignation, was still included in the bargaining unit, and as noted by the General Counsel, still entitled to the benefits of union representation (including the duty of fair representation) from the assignee union. |
| www.nlrb.gov /nlrb/shared_files/decisions/312/312-131.txt (2454 words) |
|