
	Where results make sense

Topic: Price Waterhouse

	PsycLAW: Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins
		Facts: Hopkins sued Price Waterhouse in federal district court alleging sex discrimination in violation of Title VII after she was refused partnership in the firm.
		The court required Price Waterhouse to show by clear and convincing evidence that the denial of partnership would have occurred absent the discrimination she had demonstrated.
		On appeal to the DC Circuit, Price Waterhouse challenged the trial court's burden shifting requirement and the application of the clear and convincing standard, claiming that Hopkins should have been required to show that impermissible discrimination was the predominant motivating factor in the adverse partnership decision.
	www.apa.org /psyclaw/price.html (256 words)

	PRICE WATERHOUSE v. HOPKINS (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-10-09)
		On Price Waterhouse's theory, even if a plaintiff shows that her gender played a part in an employment decision, it is still her burden to show that the decision would have been different if the employer had [490 U.S. not discriminated.
		Price Waterhouse appears to think that we cannot affirm the factual findings of the trial court without deciding that, instead of being overbearing and aggressive and curt, Hopkins is, in fact, kind and considerate and patient.
		Price Waterhouse does not challenge the Court of Appeals' conclusion that the refusal to repropose her for partnership amounted to a constructive discharge.
	www.batlaw.org /Waterhouse.htm (17837 words)

	PricewaterhouseCoopers - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
		It was formed in 1998 from a merger between Price Waterhouse and Coopers and Lybrand.
		As a result of trade between the United Kingdom and the United States of America, Price Waterhouse opened an office in the New York in 1890, and the American firm itself soon expanded rapidly.
		In 1998 Price Waterhouse and Coopers and Lybrand merged to form PricewaterhouseCoopers in an attempt to gain a scale that would put the new firm in a different league.
	en.wikipedia.org /wiki/Price_Waterhouse_Coopers (1473 words)

	Liu v. Price Waterhouse LLP (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-10-09)
		Price Waterhouse and CLR denied infringement and filed a counterclaim against Liu for copyright infringement, alleging that Liu infringed their copyrights in the China RevUp32 program by filing a copyright registration in her name.
		Additionally, Price Waterhouse was found to have breached the June 7, 1995 letter agreement by failing to pay Yang the $246,000 that was due to her.
		The district court then granted Price Waterhouse and CLR's motion for remittitur, reducing Yang's award from $600,000 to $264,000 on the grounds that the only evidence Yang presented to the jury on her breach-of-contract claim was that Price Waterhouse owed her $264,000 pursuant to the June 7, 1995 letter agreement.
	www.bowie-jensen.com /liucase.html (3011 words)

	Price Waterhouse Introduces PW/Gartner Group Learning Educational Series to the Market (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-10-09)
		Price Waterhouse has announced they will be providing a unique and technologically advanced SAP training tool to the Indian market.
		Price Waterhouse is one of the largest SAP product implementers in the U S and has been the recipient of SAP’s Award of Excellence each year it has been awarded.
		The Price Waterhouse Global SAP Practice is a leader in the market in terms of live implementations, Fortune 200 SAP market share, infrastructure and tools to support the consistent delivery of SAP implementation services around the world, a suite of integrated tools including an on-line integrated methodology, and industry specific templates.
	www.ipan.com /PRESS/97mar/2603pw.htm (490 words)

	PRICE WATERHOUSE v. HOPKINS - Majority Opinion
		Price Waterhouse places no limit on the number of persons whom it will admit to the partnership in any given year.
		Despite Price Waterhouse's attempt at trial to minimize her contribution to this project, Judge Gesell [490 U.S. 228, 234] specifically found that Hopkins had "played a key role in Price Waterhouse's successful effort to win a multi-million dollar contract with the Department of State." 618 F. Supp., at 1112.
		Noting that Price Waterhouse could avoid equitable relief by proving by clear and convincing evidence that it would have placed Hopkins' candidacy on hold even absent this discrimination, the judge decided that the firm had not carried this heavy burden.
	www.hellerhuron.com /cases/major.html (2548 words)

Check Point Software:Price Waterhouse East Caribbean Firm Partners With Check Point Software

Try your search on: Qwika (all wikis)