| |
| | 98-4085 -- Byrns v. State of Utah -- 12/16/1998 |
 | | Without addressing the procedural default issue, the state moved to dismiss, arguing that petitioner failed to exhaust state remedies because he sought neither certiorari review of his conviction nor state post-conviction relief. |
 | | By August 20, 1996, however, when the district court remanded the matter to the magistrate judge to determine the applicability of the procedural bar rule, the Act was in effect, and the state could, and did, assert a procedural default defense. |
 | | Therefore, the petitioner was procedurally barred from seeking relief in Utah state courts and, as a consequence, had procedurally defaulted for purposes of federal habeas relief. |
| www.kscourts.org /ca10/cases/1998/12/98-4085.htm (1468 words) |
|