| |
| | 26 Wn.2d 740, THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, on the Relation of Western Canadian Greyhound Lines, Limited, Plaintiff, v. THE ... |
 | | The fact that, in both an application for a writ of prohibition and the brief in support thereof, it is made to appear with sufficient clearness what questions are presented, is a substantial compliance with Rule of Supreme Court 16, 18 Wn. |
 | | Hence, two factors are necessary to the issuance of the writ; absence or excess of jurisdiction, and absence of an adequate remedy in the ordinary course of the law. |
 | | In granting a writ of prohibition restraining the superior court from proceeding with the case, we held that relator was not transacting business in King county, and that service of summons was not had upon a proper agent of relator. |
| www.mrsc.org /mc/courts/supreme/026wn2d/026wn2d0740.htm (5946 words) |
|