| |
| | The Protoavis controversy - EvoWiki (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-11-03) |
 | | Chatterjee claims that the humerus of Protoavis is “remarkably avian” (1997, 53), but as in all matters with the fossils referred to this taxon, accurate identification of the elaborate trochanters, ridges, etc., attributed to the humerus by Chatterjee is impossible at this time. |
 | | Interestingly, the expanded distal condyles, which appear to be present in the humerus of Protoavis and enlarged deltopectoral crest, are congruent with the morphology of ceratosaur humeri, as is the apparent presence of a distal brachial depression (Gauthier and Rowe 1990). |
 | | The tibia of Protoavis allegedly possesses both a lateral and cranial cnemial crest, though the validity of this claim is subject to question due to the preservation quality of the material. |
| wiki.cotch.net /wiki.phtml?title=The_Protoavis_controversy (4265 words) |
|