| | Canesi v. Wilson (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-10-20) |
 | | Rather, the test of proximate cause is satisfied by showing that an undisclosed fetal risk was material to a woman in the plaintiff's position; the risk materialized, was reasonably forseeable and not remote in relation to the doctor's negigence; and, had plaintiff known of that risk, she would have terminated her pregnancy. |
 | | Hence, the test of proximate cause in such cases requires that the plaintiff establish a causal relation between the prescribed drug about which she was inadequately warned and the harm that materialized. |
 | | Rather, the test of proximate causation is satisfied by showing that an undisclosed fetal risk was material to a woman in her position; the risk materialized, was reasonably foreseeable and not remote in relation to the doctor's negligence; and, had plaintiff known of that risk, she would have terminated her pregnancy. |
| lw.bna.com /lw/19990706/a4697.htm (14516 words) |