| |
| |
PURSUER AGAINST DEFENDER IN THE CASE OF CHILD A v. , 06 March 2002, Sheriff Laura Duncan |
 | | The pursuer was not shrewd enough to cope with the guile and deliberate awkwardness of the defender and C. There were spurious objections made about the pursuer, mainly to the effect that he was unreliable, and always changing arrangements. |
 | | If the pursuer had been used by the defender and C for the purposes of identity alone, it is highly unlikely that the other events before and after the birth would have taken place, including visits to the wider families. |
 | | Although the pursuer was not a friend of the defender and C, he was known to them, as working some evenings at Bennett's and was in sufficiently good terms with C's brother E, who introduced the pursuer to the defender and C for the purposes of discussion regarding AID. |
| www.scotcourts.gov.uk /opinions/SH%20COURT.html (12940 words) |
|