| |
| |
No. 99-2067 |
 | | Ovadal was identified as "being in charge" of what both parties referred to as the "picketers." It was undisputed, as the trial court found, that "Ovadal, an antiabortion picketer,... |
 | | Ovadal argues, and both the trial court and this court agree, that regulating speech in a traditional public forum such as thoroughfares is subject to the highest scrutiny. |
 | | Finally, while adopting without reiterating the trial court's rationale concerning Ovadal's vagueness challenge, this court would add that a person who intends to picket within a highway's right-of-way would not reasonably be concerned that by carrying a sign, he or she has thereby "placed" that sign under any conventional, commonly understood connotation of the word. |
| www.wisbar.org /res/capp/z1999/99-2067.htm (3430 words) |
|