| |
| | Lumley v Motts (2003 NYSlipOp 18821) (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-10-02) |
 | | Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, the complaint is dismissed insofar as asserted against the appellants, and the action against the remaining defendants is severed. |
 | | Ratel slid while attempting to reach the can and collided with Lumley. |
 | | The plaintiffs commenced this action against, among others, Ratel and his mother Joann Motts (hereinafter the appellants), alleging, inter alia, a negligence cause of action against Ratel and a cause of action based on negligent supervision against Motts. |
| www.courts.state.ny.us /reporter/3dseries/2003/2003_18821.htm (258 words) |
|