| |
| | ATM_Feb95: The Rayleigh Criterion (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-11-06) |
 | | An example of this kind of thinking was seen in all its glory in the November, 1990, issue of Sky and Telescope in which, beginning on page 482, several 10-inch paraboloids are tested. |
 | | On page 484 of that same issue it is stated that a Newtonian primary can qualify, by itself, for the Rayleigh Tolerance and thus be termed diffraction limited. |
 | | It is quite meaningless to speak of the Rayleigh Criterion as applying to a single element in an optical train, such as a paraboloid. |
| astro.umsystem.edu /atm/ARCHIVES/FEB95/0155.html (492 words) |
|