| |
| |
Red Top Mining Inc. v. Anthony (7/30/99) sp-5143 |
 | | Anthony contended that Red Top had acquired title in one of two ways: first, as a successor in interest, it had acquired title through an option contract that was originally executed in 1937; or alternatively, it owned the claim through adverse possession. |
 | | Thus, Red Top argued that the transfer from Red Top to Anthony was a nullity. |
 | | Alternatively, Red Top argues that it only "can be held to have been put on notice" of Anthony's action as of January 2, 1997, the day when it learned that Anthony was seeking to quiet title against Red Top as well as the heirs and those unknown. |
| www.touchngo.com /sp/html/sp-5143.htm (1855 words) |
|