| | Gene Expression: Regression to the Mean and Galton’s Fallacy (not!) |
 | | Another elementary error is to suppose that the regression of x on y is the inverse of the regression of y on x, so that, e.g., if fathers who are 6’ tall have sons who are on average 5’10” tall, then sons who are 5’10” tall will on average have fathers who are 6’ tall. |
 | | Galton also arguably committed fallacy 9, because he believed that in the long term individuals regressed towards the mean of their entire ancestral population, and not to the mean of their direct ancestors. |
 | | Galton’s belief in ’perpetual regression’ was not a simple misunderstanding of statistics, but was a consequence of his biological theory of heredity, which included a belief in ’positions of organic stability’ to which organisms tended to revert unless a new position of stability is reached by a large and sudden ‘jump’. |
| www.gnxp.com /MT2/archives/002573.html (2967 words) |