| |
| |
Defining and non-defining relative clauses. Fowler, H. W. 1908. The King's English |
 | | The function of a defining relative clause is to limit the application of the antecedent; where that is already precise, a defining clause is not wanted. |
 | | This fact, that the removal of a defining clause destroys the meaning of the antecedent, supplies an infallible test for distinguishing between the defining and the non-defining clause: the latter can always, the former never, be detached without disturbing the truth of the main predication. |
 | | A non-defining clause gives independent comment, description, explanation, anything but limitation of the antecedent; it can always be rewritten either as a parenthesis or as a separate sentence, and this is true, however essential the clause may be to the point of the main statement. |
| www.bartleby.com /116/204.html (1418 words) |
|