| |
| | “To Pee and not to Pee |
 | | In such circumstances, The Dog argued, idealizations of epistemic subjectivity according to which we are completely consistent, logically omniscient, etc are irrelevant to epistemology, and the adoption of a logic suited to inferential angels would be irrational. |
 | | Logic, then, if it is to play its proper epistemological role, must not only get us from truth to truth but also prevent our going from truth to falsehood, and even more importantly, from unavoidable, justifiedly believed falsehood to spurious falsehood. |
 | | This will disturb those who believe that the subject matter of logic is logical truth and logical falsehood, and that there is lots of it around—that is, that besides entailments, there are sentences that are logically true or false. |
| www.smith.edu /philosophy/jgarfieldpee.htm (4318 words) |
|