| |
| | [No title] |
 | | Bork's unhappiness, or outrage, with Griswold stems, he says, not so much from the outcome (though he does describe it and its progeny as symptoms of "'the rampant individualism of the modern era,"' which asserts that "all individuals are entitled, as a matter of constitutional right, to engage in any form of sexual activity"') |
 | | Bork identifies the Griswold case and its progeny as the premier examples of judicial seduction, and yet (as we have seen) close examination of his analytical collar and tie suggests that he has been engaging in a bit of scholarly dalliance of his own. |
 | | Bork feels otherwise, but he is able to maintain so only through the hoary trick of slipping the desired conclusion in among the definitions, axioms and assignments of burden so as to produce, as if by magic, the desired result at the end. |
| instapundit.com /lawrev/sexliesj.htm (15052 words) |
|