| |
| | Rednova NEWS | Logical Positivism, Naturalistic Epistemology, and the Foundations of Psychology (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-10-07) |
 | | Carnap's theory of induction was designed to be a purely logical account, analogous to deductive logic, and one that was quantitative in nature, with the concept of inductive support being characterized as the relation of partial validity holding between the premises of an argument and the conclusion. |
 | | Although Carnap was not always clear about it, he seems to have believed that methodology was an empirical study of scientific procedure, an account of the procedures used and resu\lts obtained, which in turn was to be analyzed behavioristically in terms of the behavior of testing and the behavior of noting the results. |
 | | Carnap's naturalistic semantics, epistemology, and philosophy of science, far from being incompatible with naturalistic epistemology, are in fact compatible with the kind of naturalism that Smith (1986) suggests is present in neo-behaviorism. |
| www.rednova.com /modules/news/tools.php?tool=print&id=91658 (6994 words) |
|