| |
| | bIPlog at boalt.org: The GPL's Day In Court |
 | | This is a violation of the GPL because its terms insist that one may only charge for the physical cost of transferring a copy of the code, not the $699 SCO asks for a single CPU running GNU/Linux and certainly not the $4,999 they want for an 8-CPU machine. |
 | | And this code, they assert, is not covered by the GPL, but rather the SCOsource licenses are intended to cover that code, for which SCO, were their hypothesis of code-theft proven, would be entitled to charge whatever fee they please. |
 | | Similarly, SCO has said that SCOsource was implemented to license SCO’s UNIX shared libraries for use with Linux. |
| www.boalt.org /biplog/archive/000603.html (2172 words) |
|