| |
| | Hydrogenaudio Forums -> The Deal With SHN |
 | | As far as I have learned through use and reading, SHN is slower on the encode and decode, inferior at compression, has no standalone hardware support, and is unseekable (without appending seek info), compared to FLAC, for example. |
 | | SHN isn't such a bad format, but it seems a little out dated now. |
 | | I think SHN is mostly continuing on momentum. It doesn't really offer anything that other codecs don't, although it does have some use for the times you need a really fast encoder to get some temporary compression. |
| www.hydrogenaudio.org /forums/index.php?showtopic=29452 (4892 words) |
|