| |
| | Nat' Academies Press, Assessment of Mars Science and Mission Priorities (2003) |
 | | The other perspective is that a state of diminishing returns has been reached (after the missions through 2005) in acquiring data to identify promising sites; enough is known now to select fruitful sites, and the best strategy is to move to sample return as quickly as possible to guide future Mars exploration. |
 | | Sample return should be deferred, therefore, until everything has been done that can be done with remote sensing and through numerous in situ measurements of key indicators such as reduced carbon, to ensure that the samples with the most compelling potential to answer the question, Did life ever arise on Mars?, are obtained. |
 | | The committee argues (see Chapter 11) that, with or without additional remote-sensing studies, there is no danger that the surface samples returned by the first mission will be identical to SNC meteorites, or that they will be uninteresting, whether or not they contain evidence bearing directly on the question of martian life. |
| www.nap.edu /books/0309089174/html/99.html (999 words) |
|