| |
| | FT April 2005: Books in Review (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-10-02) |
 | | The rule of law, he has argued, demands that we be bound by the text of the law—not by evolving social standards, not even by some elusive authorial intent, but by the actual words of the Constitution and of the statutes passed by state and federal legislatures. |
 | | The collection confirms Scalia’s reputation as a trenchant critic of judicial arrogance and as a dogged defender of the Constitution as it was originally understood. |
 | | Scalia insists repeatedly that malleable judicial standards—reflected not only in the Court’s appeals to evolving social norms, foreign courts, and living documents, but also, in some cases, in its reliance on authorial intent—give the Court carte blanche to impose its arbitrary will. |
| www.firstthings.com /ftissues/ft0504/reviews/goss.html (1396 words) |
|