| |
| | Joe Conley (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-11-03) |
 | | One of the co-authors of the amendment removing the anti-Darwin language from the resolution remarked, “I don’t know if it is our place to be making the determination that Charles Darwin was a racist.”[2] Broome, meanwhile, blamed the media for “demonizing” her and misinforming the public about the intent of her resolution. |
 | | “It’s unusual to have state-level legislation,” Scott observed, “but the idea itself [Darwin as progenitor of racism] is pervasive both in the anti-evolution literature from the creationists and also, unfortunately, in the fl community.”[4]That the association of Darwinism with racism should be particularly widespread in the African-American community is at first rather surprising. |
 | | Racism, he wrote, “in the form of racial hatreds, racial warfare, the assumption of racial superiority or inferiority, and other such virulent offshoots, is strictly a product of evolutionary thinking.”[8] |
| www.princeton.edu /~jconley/DarwinRacism (2424 words) |
|