| | Scottish Affairs, N McEwen; Is Devolution at Risk? (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-11-03) |
 | | Although the larger number of parties offered potentially greater choice, cross-national election surveys suggest that too much choice acts as a deterrent, diminishing the extent to which individuals feel their votes are going towards the election of a government (Blais and Dobrzynska, 1998). |
 | | The establishment of a Scottish Parliament came to be regarded and promoted, not just as a vehicle for the expression of Scottish national identity, but as a pre-requisite for better public services and progressive social and economic change in line with Scottish policy priorities (McEwen, 2002; Mitchell and Bennie, 1996). |
 | | Parties supporting either the abolition of the Parliament (UK Independence Party) or a curtailment of its size and power (Scottish People's Alliance) received marginal support in the election, in spite of the evident drift towards outside the political mainstream and the latter's well-publicised efforts to capitalise on dismay with devolution. |
| www.scottishaffairs.org /onlinepub/sa/mcewen_sa44_sum03.html (5720 words) |