| | Submissions and Contributions to IEEE P1363.1 (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-10-11) |
 | | For parameter sets in [3] that claim k-bit security but are vulnerable to this attack, we find that an attacker can typically recover a single key with about k/2 bits of effort. |
 | | The original presentation of the NTRUSign signature scheme gave a set of parameters that were claimed to give 80 bits of security, but did not give a general recipe for generating parameter sets to a specific level of security. |
 | | Compared to other public key cryptosystems at roughly equivalent levels of security, NTRU offers: more efficient encryption and decryption, in both hardware and software implementations; much faster key generation, allowing the use of ``disposable'' keys (because keys are computationally ``cheap'' to create). |
| grouper.ieee.org /groups/1363/lattPK/submissions.html (1545 words) |