| |
| | the difficulties of interdisciplinarity: cognitive science, rhetoric, and time-bound knowledge |
 | | I believe that the great changes not only in literary studies but in many of the other traditional disciplines that have occurred in the last decades in large part call for establishing "bridges," rethinking disciplinary borders, and discovering modes of collaboration among people whose "meanings" and "processes" (key terms in Simon's essay) are very different. |
 | | Semiotics, unlike story grammars, systematically pursues the analyses of meaning beyond the confines of sentences, and like cognitive science it assumes the canons of scientific truth that Simon claims for "expository prose": correspondence to empirical evidence ("veridicality"), generalizing self-consistency ("clarity, absence of ambiguity"), and simplicity. |
 | | Contemporary literary studies, among other things, is calling these Enlightenment concepts and methods into question, not simply to reject them-they all do important work and can be understood, in particular contexts, in terms of precise operational definitions. |
| www.stanford.edu /group/SHR/4-1/text/schleifer.commentary.html (986 words) |
|