| |
| | FWB, Spring/Summer 1996 - Commentary |
 | | The issue is explosive, because to the degree that states can agree that the definition is confined, for instance, to unassimilated "tribals" and "primitives" in "settler states," the whole question of indigenous peoples' rights increasingly becomes a moot point. |
 | | Just as some states are manuevering to evade the indigenous claim to self-determination, other states are manuevering to blunt the definitional question, several by insisting that there are no indigenous peoples existing in their territorial boundaries. |
 | | States are obviously seeking to protect their political, economic, and territorial interests, regardless of the methods used to advance those interests, or on whose indigenous backs those interests have been constructed. |
| carbon.cudenver.edu /home/conversion/fwc/Commentary-old/rights-4.html (853 words) |
|