| |
| | The Scientist : Sexual selection alternative slammed (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-09-15) |
 | | In the review, Joan Roughgarden of Stanford University in California and two co-authors claim that sexual selection theory, which emphasizes the often-different interests of males and females, is fatally flawed. |
 | | Many critics argue that Roughgarden and her colleagues' theory is not exactly new -- and is, in fact, sexual selection in disguise. |
 | | "Sexual selection theory is not deeply flawed, and happily includes all of the points Roughgarden et al try and make," letter-writer David Shuker, at the University of Edinburgh, UK, told The Scientist. |
| www.the-scientist.com /news/display/23358 (591 words) |
|