| |
| | The semiotic function and the genesis of pictorial meaning |
 | | The sign, then (synonymous, it would appear so far, with the semiotic function), is not comprehensive enough to delimit the field of semiotics: rather, the domain of semiotics is meaning (or mediation), in some wider, yet to be specified sense. |
 | | Whereas the items forming the sign are conceived to be clearly differentiated entities and indeed as pertaining to different realms of reality, the mental and the physical in terms of naive consciousness, the items of the context continuously flow into each other, and are not felt to be different in nature. |
 | | More importantly, perhaps, he argues that imitation does not manifest the semiotic function, but is a prerequisite for it: indeed, it will function as a sign only to the extent that it is taken to refer back to the imitated act, instead of just being another instance of the same kind. |
| www.arthist.lu.se /kultsem/sonesson/ImatraCourseTx1.html (3786 words) |
|