| |
| | UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and ROBERT B. REICH, Secretary of the United States Department of Labor, Plaintiffs, - against ... (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-11-04) |
 | | Such a restriction, particularly given the existence of the other injunctions, is necessary to prevent a reasonable likelihood of their repeating past acts, and, as [*36] long as it is limited to visits to clubs where commercial interests or union affairs are discussed, is appropriate in the light of this record. |
 | | The involvement of the Six Individual Defendants and their associates not party to this motion constituted an entrenched pattern of activity unlikely to cease of its own accord, and their associational rights may be curtailed to further the public's interest in eliminating such corruption. |
 | | Although they were acting in their capacity as union officials, not employers of MTDC and LIUNA labor, the Six Individual Defendants committed acts that bore a serious impact on and required the cooperation of those employers. |
| www.thelaborers.net /court_cases/us_vs_mason_tenders-1995-11-14.htm (9789 words) |
|