| |
| | Dred Scott v. Sandford: Mr. Justice NELSON concurring |
 | | Because the law of Missouri, under which he was held as a slave, had no operation by its own force extraterritorially; and the State of Illinois refused to recognise its effect within her limits, upon principles of comity, as a state of slavery was inconsistent with her laws, and contrary to her policy. |
 | | The idea seems to be, that the courts of a State are not to change their opinions, or, if they do, the first decision is to be regarded by this court as the law of the State. |
 | | In each one of these, with two exceptions, the master or mistress removed into the free State with the slave, with a view to a permanent residencein other words, to make that his or her domicil. |
| www.tourolaw.edu /patch/Scott/Nelson.asp (3730 words) |
|