| |
| | Theoretical Primatology Project: Research Page 2 |
 | | While, in my opinion, Clutton-Brock underestimates the role of (social) parasitism (e.g., phenotypic manipulation), he provides numerous testable ideas, including his conclusion that mutualism, generalized reciprocity, and group size are variables likely to explain many cases of cooperative breeding as well as cooperation. |
 | | Relating these findings to our discussion of "social parasitism" (SP: e.g., "phenotypic manipulation"), it is important to note that SP may select for sociality in some regimes (see, for example, Crespi and Choe, 1997; Schwarz et al., 1997) and predicts exactly the sorts of discrimination capacities described for baboons by Bergman and his associates. |
 | | It is important to determine why social parasitism and other selection pressures favoring sociality (e.g., predation) have apparently led, in some taxa (e.g., many primate species, including humans) to higher-order cognition and individuality but, in other taxa (e.g., social insects) to alternate discrimination and information-processing mechanisms and to castes ("true sociality"). |
| www.robertwilliams.org /tpp/tppresearch02.html (3349 words) |
|