| |
| | criticalissues.html |
 | | Scholarship on Dickinson's punctuation limits itself in two key ways: by defining punctuation along conventional, bibliographic lines, and by presenting it as an effect on the eye or the ear, but not on both at the same time. |
 | | Brita Lindberg also characterizes Dickinson's punctuation along conventional lines, finding that although Dickinson's "marks" vary greatly in slant and position, they may be "profitably reduce[d to] the ones adopted by the Harvard edition: the question mark, the exclamation point, the period, the comma, and the dash" (354). |
 | | Nevertheless, they display two key problems: punctuation is implied as a separate category from space; and the experiences of the eye and ear -- although validly seen as simultaneous and interrelated -- are discussed primarily as effects of "letters" and not of space, lineation, and other forms of punctuation. |
| www.mith.umd.edu /courses/amvirtual/punctuation/criticalissues.html (1026 words) |
|