| |
| | Standing Alone: |
 | | Indeed, in the Fair Housing Act context, a separate "standing" inquiry can only lead to mischief since if a plaintiff's case is dismissed only on "standing" grounds, she could presumably pursue the claim in a forum in which Article III is inapplicable. |
 | | Wright, the Court stated that the "stigmatic" injury suffered by the plaintiffs was not "judicially cognizable" n105 --an expression that, in that instance, merely referred to the fact that it was not an injury that met the Article III "particularity" requirement. |
 | | Case law has, in fact, given us two different visions of the "statutory rights gambit." The first holds that there are some actual (or "de facto") injuries that do not make the grade as Article III injuries without statutory assistance, and that need a congressional boost. |
| www.cir-usa.org /articles/179.html (7569 words) |
|