| |
| | 16:0561(79)CA - Minnesota Army NG, The Adjutant General, State of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN and ACT, Tony Kempenich ... |
 | | Upon consideration of the General Counsel's Motion for Summary Judgment, Respondent's reply thereto, and all the pleadings and exhibits, it appears that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the General Counsel is entitled to Summary Judgment as a matter of law. |
 | | The General Counsel, therefore, requested that since all of the material allegations of the complaint had been admitted a Motion for Summary Judgment was appropriate unless the facts admitted were insufficient to constitute a violation of 5 U.S.C. 7116(a)(1), (5) and (6). |
 | | There the Authority stated: It is clear, therefore, from the literal language of section 7116 of the Statute and the intent of Congress as expressed in the related legislative history, under the Statute, Authority review of a final Panel Decision. |
| www.flra.gov /decisions/v16/16-079-3.html (2758 words) |
|