| | Fredrikson & Byron, P.A. - Additional Guidance on the Application of the Minnesota Whistleblower Statute (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-10-20) |
 | | The Whistleblower statute, in essence, prohibits employers from discharging or taking any other adverse employment action against an employee because he or she has |
 | | One of the unsettled questions under this statute was whether an employee or former employee, who claims to have been discharged for having complained of sexual harassment, can maintain both a reprisal claim under the Minnesota Human Rights Act and a claim under the Whistleblower Act on the same facts. |
 | | In May of last year, the Minnesota Court of Appeals, in a case involving allegations that an individual was terminated for having complained of sexual harassment, ruled that an individual could indeed maintain a reprisal claim under the Minnesota Human Rights Act and simultaneously maintain a claim for a violation of the Whistleblower statute. |
| www.fredlaw.com /articles/employment/empl_96fa_amr.html (617 words) |