| |
| | Bruce Eckel's MindView, Inc: 5-2-03 Strong Typing vs. Strong Testing |
 | | At this point, a strong, statically-typed language would be sputtering with rage, insisting that this kind of sloppiness will cause disaster and mayhem. |
 | | That is to say, if a program compiles in a strong, statically typed language, it just means that it has passed some tests. |
 | | To claim that the strong, static type checking constraints in C++, Java, or C# will prevent you from writing broken programs is clearly an illusion (you know this from personal experience). |
| www.mindview.net /WebLog/log-0025 (1906 words) |
|