| | Talk:Three forms of mathematical induction - Information (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-10-08) |
 | | This must be possible, since otherwise (by another induction I won't write out here) the tree has an infinite sequence of descendents, meaning that it is either infinite (which it isn't because it only has k+1 nodes with any children) or else cyclic (but then it wouldn't be a tree by definition of tree). |
 | | Oh yes, and the thing that I understand by "structural induction" can usually (my guess is always, but I don't want to have to prove it) be recast as strong induction on the size of the structure. |
 | | That's not necessarily to say that structural induction isn't sufficiently useful a concept to be added to the article (which would then have to be retitled), just that the challenge as stated can be met... |
| www.book-spot.co.uk /index.php/Talk:Three_forms_of_mathematical_induction (1023 words) |