| |
| | [No title] |
 | | Then there exists vi, vj, iEMBED Equation.3 j such that if H — vi is replaced by H — vj then the resulting family of subgraphs is not a legitimate deck, and (ii) not all subgraphs in the family are isomorphic, and (iii) at least one of these subgraphs is connected. |
 | | Here the k subgraphs of EMBED Equation.3 which form the family S, must come by deleting a vertex from the component F. This implies that F and H share the common subdeck H1, H2,
, Hk. |
 | | Consider when the component H is (i) not regular and not quasi-regular, or (ii) regular or quasi-regular Case(i) H not regular, H not quasi-regular Choose c subgraphs of H as in the Lemma 5. |
| staff.um.edu.mt /jlau/research/rec_no.doc (1581 words) |
|