| |
| | Sunk Costs |
 | | C in making the case for the economist=s doctrine about sunk costs is, however, often thought to be a complete theory of rationality so far as it pertains to the selection of actions, specifically, to what it is rational to do, given certain information and objectives. |
 | | Generalizing, for any case in which a sunk cost has been incurred, we can construct a parallel case in which preferences, assets and expectations are precisely the same, but no sunk cost has been incurred. |
 | | In the future, I shall refer to the position that sunk costs should never be honored or taken into account in decision making as >the economist=s doctrine= because economists, more than other decision theorists, have typically seen no rational place for attending to sunk costs. |
| personal.bgsu.edu /~roberth/sunkost.html (4872 words) |
|