| |
| | Glot International, Journal Section |
 | | De Vries indicates that the "pivot" referred to in (1b) purports to be "a constituent semantically shared by both the relative clause and the matrix clause", and furthermore one that has some syntactic realization in both clauses, possibly as a phonological "gap". |
 | | Be this as it may, the fact that restrictives, unlike appositives, involve syntactic, rather than discourse binding, is brought out by the insensitivity of the binding relation to the presence/absence of modal subordination (note the contrast in acceptability between (3d) and (5)). |
 | | This suggests that syntactic A'-movement is not involved in the derivation of these constructions, and that their interpretation is achieved due to binding operations; this is in effect the tack pursued in Bonneau (1992), Grosu (2000c), and Watanabe (2002). |
| www.linguistlistplus.com /glot/html/Gi6206/GI6602_SOA.htm (11487 words) |
|