| |
| | [No title] |
 | | In accounting for ‘analogy’, for example, ‘no complicated operation such as the grammarian's conscious analysis is presumed on the part of the speaker’; ‘the sum of the conscious and methodological classifications made by the grammarian’ ‘must coincide with the associations, conscious or not, that are set up in speaking’ (CG 167, 137f). |
 | | Moreover, ‘syntagmatic’ and ‘associative’ ‘solidarities’ ‘are what limits arbitrariness’ and supplies ‘motivation’: ‘(1) analysis of a given term, hence a syntagmatic relation; and (2) the summoning of one or more other terms, hence an associative relation’ (CG 132f) (cf. |
 | | Therefore, ‘not every syntagmatic fact is classed as syntactical’ (and pertaining to the language system), ‘but every syntactical fact belongs to the syntagmatic class’ (CG 137). |
| www.revista.discurso.org /beaugrande/2-Saussure.htm (13575 words) |
|