Talk:Angular velocity - Factbites
 Factbites
 Where results make sense
About us   |   Why use us?   |   Reviews   |   PR   |   Contact us  

Topic: Talk:Angular velocity


    Note: these results are not from the primary (high quality) database.


In the News (Fri 25 Dec 09)

  
 Re: At what point(s) on a parabolic curve is a moving particle a rest?
In fact, if we are talking about the parabolic trajectory of a particle under the influence of gravity, and if frictional forces are ignored, the component of velocity along the X-axis will remain constant.
Usually in physics when we talk about particles moving in a parabolic path, we are intending to describe the path of a particle given an initial velocity in a gravitational field.
For instance, if one were to examine the parabolic trajectory in the polar coordinate system, the angular component would never become zero, but would approach zero at great distances from the center of the system.
www.madsci.org /posts/archives/may99/927160851.Ph.r.html

  
 Time [Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy]
After a minute the water will have the same angular velocity as the bucket, and there will again be no relative motion between the bucket and the water.
If so, we should revise our definition of "person." The logic of the term "time" that is embedded in our time talk does not rule out a nonlinear structure for time, but there is no reason to believe (physical) time is actually like this or that anything has gone back in time.
The presentist and the advocate of the growing past will usually unite in opposition to the block universe on the grounds that it misses the special "open" character of the future and the equally significant point that the present is so much more "vivid" than any other time-slice of spacetime.
www.iep.utm.edu /t/time.htm

Try your search on: Qwika (all wikis)

Factbites
  About us   |   Why use us?   |   Reviews   |   Press   |   Contact us  
Copyright © 2005-2007 www.factbites.com Usage implies agreement with terms.