Talk:Consensual crime

Talk:Consensual crime - Factbites
Where results make sense
About us | Why use us? | Reviews | PR | Contact us

Topic: Talk:Consensual crime

Note: these results are not from the primary (high quality) database.

	Meatball Wiki: WikiCooperationArticle
		At least under Wiki:WikiChangeProposal the intention is to let "authored" (non-consensual) comment to "own" a name, and several editors can own a name without clashing and there'll be a disambiguation mechanism in place that assigns top priority to the preferences of the readership.
		It's such a taboo, so unthinkable, that people don't even talk about these standards.
		It's THE "wiki crime" to forge communication, to put words into the mouth of people which they haven't said.
	www.usemod.com /cgi-bin/mb.pl?WikiCooperationArticle (3580 words)

	City Attorney Shares Reality of Prosecuting Sexual Assault Cases
		Zug said rape cases are notoriously hard to try in part because of the burden of proof; there are usually only two witnesses to the crime—the victim and the defendant.
		Defense attorneys can use only three defenses against rape prosecutions in Virginia: the defendant can say there was no penetration and therefore no rape; he can say the victim was raped, but not by him; or he can argue that the sex was consensual.
		Zug said he makes a point not to talk about the assault in his first meeting with a rape victim.
	www.law.virginia.edu /home2002/html/news/2001_02/zug.htm (3580 words)

Try your search on: Qwika (all wikis)

Topic: Talk:Consensual crime

Ads by Google