Talk:Consideration under English law

Talk:Consideration under English law - Factbites
Where results make sense
About us | Why use us? | Reviews | PR | Contact us

Topic: Talk:Consideration under English law

Note: these results are not from the primary (high quality) database.

	OUCLF: articles: W Swadling (2000)
		When English unjust enrichment lawyers talk of "illegality", they generally do so in the context of the unravelling of partly-performed illegal contracts.
		And when those cases are extracted from the law of unjust enrichment there remains no authority for saying that illegality ever operates as a cause of action in the English law of unjust enrichment.
		Since, absent the illegality, the plaintiff would have undoubtably had a claim for restitution of unjust enrichment based on a total failure of consideration, the illegal nature of the design is undoubtably operating as a defence here too.
	ouclf.iuscomp.org /articles/swadling.shtml (8257 words)

	The Definition of Morality
		When “morality” is used simply to refer to a code of conduct put forward by a society, whether or not it is distinguished from etiquette, law, and religion, then it is being used in a completely descriptive sense.
		When people explicitly talk about the morality of a group other than their own or of a person other than themselves, it is usually clear that they are using “morality” in a descriptive sense.
		However, the English concept of morality is more completely secular and almost all who distinguish morality from religion regard morality as governing only that behavior that directly or indirectly affects others.
	plato.stanford.edu /entries/morality-definition (5056 words)

Try your search on: Qwika (all wikis)

Topic: Talk:Consideration under English law

Ads by Google