| |
| | CANADA/JAPAN: TARIFF ON IMPORTS OF LUMBER (L/6470 - 36S/167)/A |
 | | If the survey of tariff treatment were to be broadened to still other countries, like Norway, Sweden, Finland, Switzerland, Australia and New Zealand, it could be shown that in these markets as well, dimension lumber would face no discrimination on a species basis, but would have a single tariff applied to it. |
 | | Even in the Japanese tariff, SPF and all other species of dimension lumber were classified in the same general tariff sub-heading (HS 4407.10) and had the same unbound status. |
 | | Tariff concessions, however, should be, and had been negotiated, and concessions, distinguished by species, had been exchanged, and upheld, in successive GATT tariff negotiations. |
| www.sice.oas.org /dispute/gatt/88lumber.asp (6554 words) |
|