
	Where results make sense

Topic: Tariff of 1833

Related Topics

Black Tariff

Nullification crisis

Tariff of Abominations

Nullification

Protectionism

South Carolina

Panic of 1837

Linus van Pelt

Oranjemund

British coinage

AOL Instant Messenger

Banorte

Specie Circular

Colonus

In the News (Wed 23 Dec 09)

Northern Trust

Marvin Harrison

Peter Chernin

Gary Locke

Match Play

Penelope Cruz

Mickey Rourke

AR Rahman

Danny Boyle

Hugh Jackman

	Tariff - LoveToKnow 1911 (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-10-10)
		The tariff history of France in the 19th century divides itself into three periods: one of complete prohibition, lasting till 1860; second, of liberal legislation, from 1860 to 1881; third, of reversion to protection after 1881.
		The tariff history of Germany, up to the foundation of the German Empire, is the history of the Zollverein or German customs union; and this in turn is closely connected with the tariff history of Prussia.
		The nullification movement led in 1833 to the well-known compromise, by which the rates of duty as established by the Act of 1832 were to be gradually reduced, reaching in 1842 a general level of 20 per cent.
	www.1911encyclopedia.org /Tariff (6316 words)

	Tariff of 1842 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
		The Tariff of 1842, or Black Tariff as it became known, was a protectionist tariff schedule adopted in the United States to reverse the effects of the Compromise Tariff of 1833.
		The Compromise Tariff contained a provision that successively lowered the tariff rates from their level under the Tariff of 1832 over a period of ten years until the majority of dutiable goods were to be taxed at 20%.
		The Tariff of 1842 was repealed in 1846 when it was replaced by the Walker Tariff.
	en.wikipedia.org /wiki/Tariff_of_1842 (509 words)

	Taxation without representation (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-10-10)
		Although tariffs are a source of government revenue, tariffs are also used as part of political and economic policies.
		The trend to increase tariffs continued in the 1800s and early 1900s and was particularly strong during the early years of the Great Depression (1930s).
		Because that tariff resulted in higher prices of articles used in the agricultural South, it was bitterly denounced by representatives of the southern states.
	www.mcps.k12.md.us /schools/rmhs/media/SocialStudies/Taxationweb.htm (2138 words)

	Historical Aspects of U.S. Trade Policy
		These tariffs were not highly protectionist duties, because Hamilton feared discouraging imports, the critical tax base on which he planned to fund the public debt.
		Tariff critics charged that those import duties raised the cost of living for consumers and harmed agricultural producers by effectively taxing their exports, thus redistributing income from consumers and farmers to big businesses in the North.
		Because the tariff also increased the prices of non-traded goods, the degree of protection was much less than indicated by nominal rates of protection; my results suggest that the 30 percent average tariff on imports yielded just a 15 percent implicit subsidy to import-competing producers while effectively taxing exporters at a rate of 11 percent.
	www.nber.org /reporter/summer06/irwin.html (2665 words)

	the development of core capitalism in the U.S.
		Tariff politics are one reflection the class forces that were contending for state power in the antebellum period.
		Tariffs on coarse woolen and cotton textiles came to be opposed by the Southern planters who were purchasing these commodities to clothe their slaves.
		The weakening of the protectionist forces in 1833 was due to the desertion of the farmers, who saw a new opening if the world market, and also to the increased mobilization of the Southern planters, rather than to an actual decrease in the power and prosperity of the manufacturers.
	www.irows.ucr.edu /cd/papers/ustariffpol.htm (13655 words)

	John Tyler
		Believing protective tariff duties to be unconstitutional, he voted against the "tariff of abominations" in 1828, and also against the tariff of 1832, since the latter measure, though reducing duties, showed no abandonment of the protective principle.
		The compromise tariff of 1833, made necessary by the hostile attitude of South Carolina, owed its inception largely to him, but he voted against the "force bill", an act for enforcing the collection of duties, being the only senator whose vote was so recorded.
		His hostility to a high tariff policy, however, did not prevent him from condemning the South Carolina ordinance of nullification; and in the presidential election of 1832 he supported Andrew Jackson, to whose political principles and methods, as to those of his advisers, he was invincibly opposed, as the "least objectionable" of the various candidates.
	www.nndb.com /people/851/000049704 (1200 words)

	1816-1860: The Second American Party System and the Tariff
		A House bill to increase the entire tariff schedule by 5 percent — with even higher duties on cotton and wool cloth, finished clothing, iron, and hemp — passed the House but was not enacted.
		The marked upward revision of the tariff rates enacted by the Tariff of 1828, dubbed the Tariff of Abominations by its southern opponents, formed the basis for the nullification crisis.
		The party platform endorsed revenue tariffs designed to generate significant funds, part of which were to be distributed to the states to pay for internal improvements (roads and canals), another component of the American System.
	www.tax.org /Museum/1816-1860.htm (2719 words)

	Nullification Proclamation: Primary Documents of American History (Virtual Programs & Services, Library of Congress)
		The Compromise Tariff of 1833 was eventually accepted by South Carolina and ended the nullification crisis.
		Negative reaction to the Tariff Act of 1828 and the Tariff Act of 1832 led to the South Carolina Ordinance of Nullification.
		On January 13, 1833, President Andrew Jackson wrote a letter to his newly elected vice-president Martin Van Buren discussing South Carolina and the nullification crisis.
	www.loc.gov /rr/program/bib/ourdocs/Nullification.html (558 words)

	SparkNotes: The Pre-Civil War Era (1815–1850): Key People & Terms
		A tariff, passed under the leadership of Henry Clay, that was designed to protect American manufacturing (prior tariffs had had the sole purpose of raising revenue).
		A tariff passed by John Tyler that brought duties on foreign manufactured goods down to the level of the Compromise Tariff of 1833.
		A nickname for the Tariff of 1828 that reflected southerners’ enormous objections to the tariff.
	www.sparknotes.com /history/american/precivilwar/terms.html (4794 words)

	Tariff Table
		President received authority to negotiate tariff reductions up to 50 percent; aimed primarily at European Economic Community (later European Union); (Kennedy administration).
		Tariffs are taxes placed on foreign goods by federal governments.
		In 1828 a new revision of the tariff was made in favor of protection.
	www.u-s-history.com /pages/h963.html (569 words)

	SparkNotes: The Pre-Civil War Era (1815–1850): Adams and Jackson: 1824–1833
		Inspired by the Virginia and Kentucky Resolutions of 1798–1799, Calhoun’s pamphlet argued that the individual states in the South should declare the tariff null and void.
		Even though Jackson himself disliked the tariff, he stood firmly against nullification and disobedience of the federal government.
		Congress did pass another lower tariff, the Tariff of 1832, as a gesture of goodwill to the South, but southerners still objected.
	www.sparknotes.com /history/american/precivilwar/section2.rhtml (1302 words)

	Andrew Jackson - MSN Encarta
		In 1832 Congress passed a tariff that South Carolina deemed as oppressive to its interests as was the 1828 Tariff of Abominations.
		The convention declared that the tariffs of 1828 and 1832 were “null, void, and no law.” Nor were they “binding upon this state, its officers or citizens.” South Carolina also threatened to secede from the Union if the federal government tried to collect the tariff duties in the state.
		The crisis was eased when, through the efforts of Henry Clay, Congress passed a compromise tariff in 1833 along with the force bill.
	encarta.msn.com /encyclopedia_761569591_7/Andrew_Jackson.html (1114 words)

	Millard Fillmore - MSN Encarta
		In the important position of chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee, Fillmore took a leading part in framing the protective tariff (tax on imports) of 1842.
		The tariff raised rates to about the high level of the tariff of 1833.
		That tariff was opposed by the South and had provoked the state of South Carolina to pass its Ordinance of Nullification, declaring the tariff void within its borders.
	encarta.msn.com /encyclopedia_761569065/Fillmore_Millard.html (739 words)

	Notecards 401-450
		The tariff protected the North but harmed the South; South said that the tariff was economically discriminatory and unconstitutional because it violated state's rights.
		The South strongly opposed protective tariffs like the Tariffs of 1828 and 1832, and protested by asserting that enforcement of the tariffs could be prohibited by individual states, and by refusing to collect tariff duties.
		When faced with the protective Tariff of 1828, John Calhoun presented a theory in the South Carolina Exposition and Protest (1828) that federal tariffs could be declared null and void by individual states and that they could refuse to enforce them.
	www.apstudent.com /ushistory/cards/cards9.html (3089 words)

	Clay, Henry. The Columbia Encyclopedia, Sixth Edition. 2001-05
		As a candidate for the presidency in 1824, Clay had the fourth largest number of electoral votes, and, with no candidate having a majority, the election went to the House, where the three highest were to be voted upon.
		South Carolina’s nullification of the tariffs of 1828 and 1832 as well as Jackson’s threats of armed invasion of that state allowed Clay to gain politically—working, even at the cost of his own protectionist views, toward a compromise with the John C. Calhoun faction, he helped to promote the Compromise Tariff of 1833.
		When Jackson had the deposits removed (1833) from the Bank of the United States to his “pet banks,” Clay secured in the Senate passage of a resolution—later expunged (Jan., 1837) from the record—censuring the President for his act.
	www.bartleby.com /65/cl/Clay-Hen.html (986 words)

	Tariff, tariff of 1832, wilson gorman tariff 1894 (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-10-10)
		Official Tariffs are published by the Panama Canal Authority and kept up to date as changes occur, to provide information to shipping.
		Some tariffs date as far back as 1997, because the applicable tariff has not been approved since that date.
		The Smoot-Hawley Tariff of 1930 was the subject of enormous controversy at the time.
	www.digitalsignaturefaq.com /tariff.html (241 words)

	papers
		Because the tariff increased the prices of non-traded goods, the degree of protection was much less than indicated by nominal rates of protection; the results here suggest that the 30 percent average tariff on imports yielded just a 12 percent implicit subsidy to import-competing producers while effectively taxing exporters at a rate of 14 percent.
		The paper also finds that tariff policy redistributed large amounts of income (about 9 percent of GDP) across groups, although the impact on consumers was roughly neutral because they devoted a sizeable share of their expenditures to exportable goods.
		Tariffs in agricultural exporting (importing) countries may have promoted (retarded) this shift, although two high tariff, high growth, agricultural-exporting outliers (Argentina and Canada) experienced export-oriented growth and did not pursue import substitution policies.
	www.dartmouth.edu /~dirwin/papers.htm (2908 words)

	Chapter 13
		The South was having economic struggles and the tariff was a scapegoat.
		It was a pamphlet that denounced the Tariff of 1828 as unjust and unconstitutional.
		The compromise Tariff of 1833 ended the dispute over the Tariff of 1832 between the South and the White House.
	www.geocities.com /theamericanpageant/ch13.html (1527 words)

	1833 Compromise (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-10-10)
		About sixteen years after the original tariff was passed for taxing imported manufactured goods, more tariffs were being passed, changing the original one slightly.
		When the tariff in 1832 was passed that actually lowered the duties somewhat, South Carolina, enlivened by Calhoun, held a state meeting, and declared that tariff and the one passed in 1828 void in their state.
		This caused Jackson to threaten to send in federal troops to fix the matter; this was helped by Congress, who passed the "Force Bill", known in South Carolina as the Bloody Bill, that allowed the use of the federal navy and army against South Carolina.
	www.scarborough.k12.me.us /high/projects/civilwar/1833.htm (181 words)

	THE GREAT CONSPIRACY, Part. 1. By John Logan
		It was not only our first Tariff Act, but, next to that prescribing the oath used in organizing the Government, the first Act of the first Federal Congress; and was passed in pursuance of the declaration of President Washington in his first Message, that "The safety and interest of the People" required it.
		Under the inspiration of Alexander Hamilton the Tariff of 1790 was enacted at the second session of the same Congress, confirming the previous Act and increasing some of the protective duties thereby imposed.
		It was the passage of the Tariff of 1824 that gave these crafty Free Traders their first great success in spreading their doctrine of Free Trade by coupling it with questions of slave labor, States Rights, and nullification, as laid down in the Kentucky and Virginia resolutions.
	www.ibiblio.org /pub/docs/books/gutenberg/7/1/4/7140/7140-h/p1.htm (10241 words)

	John C. Calhoun
		Early in his career Calhoun was an ardent nationalist, a supporter of the War of 1812 against England, and a cautious supporter of the 1816 tariff (always a point of contention between North and South) as a source of revenue to replenish the Federal treasury after the war.
		The most intense conflict centered around the 1828 tariff law, nicknamed the "Tariff of Abominations," which Calhoun opposed as detrimental to the interests of the South and the preservation of the Union.
		It was in a speech in response to this tariff that Calhoun first articulated the doctrine of nullification.
	www.uua.org /uuhs/duub/articles/johnccalhoun.html (1925 words)

	Jacksonian_Democracy
		They were especially anxious that the tariff be changed after Congress voted to hike it in 1828—the so-called "Tariff of Abominations," which raised tariff rates to their highest level before the Civil War.
		In November of 1832, the convention met and nullified the tariffs of 1828 and 1832.
		Finally, In March of 1833, Congress passed a compromise tariff, the Tariff of 1833, which lowered the rates in slow stages over the next eight years until it rested the relatively inoffensive level of the original Tariff of 1816.
	home.earthlink.net /~kahnep63/Jacksonian_Democracy.html (2183 words)

	Study Guide - (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-10-10)
		Note: In 1832 and 1833, tariff rates were falling, in part in response to the South Carolina Nullification Ordinance (see below).
		Summarize the positions of Henry Stark of New Hampshire on the tariff and John Quimby of Springfield, MA.
		While this ordinance does not deal explicitly with the economics of tariffs, it shows the consequences of economic policy.
	www.union.edu /PUBLIC/ECODEPT/kleind/eco024/assignments/024_sg_tariffs_2.htm (661 words)

	Tariff of 1833 (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-10-10)
		The Tariff of 1833, also known as the Compromise Tariff, was proposed by Henry Clay and John C. Calhoun as a resolution to the Nullification Crisis.
		It was adopted to gradually reduce the rates after southerners objected to the protectionism found in the Tariff of 1832 and Tariff of Abominations, causing South Carolina to threaten secession.
		This Act stipulated that import taxes would gradually be cut over the next decade until they matched the levels set in 1816 - an average of 20% - in 1842.
	tariff-of-1833.iqnaut.net (127 words)

	aphistoryfghs: I couldn't find information on Fiscal Ba
		It reversed the effects of the Compromise Tariff of 1833 and raised the tax rates to the moderately protective level of 32 percent, as it was in 1832.
		The Tariff of 1832 was repealed in 1846 and was replaced by the Walker Tariff.
		It was passed along with a series of financial reforms proposed by Walker including the Warehousing Act of 1846.The Walker Tariff remained in effect until the Tariff of 1857, which reduced rates further.
	community.livejournal.com /aphistoryfghs/26237.html (1929 words)

	Nullification Crisis
		South Carolina called a state convention that nullified the tariffs of 1828 and 1832 within their borders and threatened to secede if the federal government attempted to collect those tariff duties.
		The nullification crisis of 1832 The tariff bill of 1816 was a sort of compromise between the conflicting interests.
		A high duty was advocated on all goods which could unquestionably be produced in sufficient quantity in the nullification crisis of 1832 The tariff bill of 1816 was a sort of compromise between the conflicting interests.
	www.u-s-history.com /pages/h333.html (440 words)

	AEH: AMER.TRADE: Antebellum Tariff Politics: Coalition Formation and Credible Commitments (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-10-10)
		This paper analyzes how the movement toward higher tariffs in the 1820s was reversed for the rest of the antebellum period.
		In the 1820s, a coalition in Congress between the North and West raised tariffs by exchanging votes on import duties for spending on internal improvements.
		Although Congress could not credibly commit to implementing the staged reductions or maintaining the lower duties, the growing economic interest of the West in exporting grains - due, ironically, to transportation improvements - gave it a stake in maintaining a lower tariff equilibrium in cooperation with the South.
	eh.net /pipermail/abstracts/2005-January/000648.html (210 words)

	Origins of the American Civil War (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-10-10)
		Platform of the [[American Anti-Slavery Society, founded in 1833 by William Lloyd Garrison and Arthur Tappan]] The anti-slavery movement of the 1830s and 1840s could not have emerged without the transformation of Northern society.
		Another example of strong Southern influence was the Compromise Tariff of 1833, which ended the Nullification crisis.
		While questions of tariffs, banking policy, public land, and subsidies to railroads did not always unite all elements in the North and the Northwest against the interests of slaveholders in the South under the pre-1854 party system, they would now get translated in terms of sectional conflict&8212;with the expansion of slavery in the West involved.
	origins-of-the-american-civil-war.iqnaut.net (11314 words)

Try your search on: Qwika (all wikis)