| |
| | Comparing Knowledge Elicitation Techniques |
 | | The aim of this paper is to formally characterise elicitation techniques concerning the required time of their application in relation to a quantitative measure of the knowledge they provide. |
 | | Modern knowledge acquisition methodologies such as KADS (Wielinga, Schreiber, and Breuker, 1992), VITAL (O'Hara, Motta, and Shadbolt, 1994) and PROTÉGÉ (Puerta, Egar, Tu, and Musen, 1992) are concerned with conceptual modelling (based on the elicited knowledge) and with later stages in the KBS development process. |
 | | The knowledge elicitation process is influenced by various factors, including the number of experts, the kind of problem, the context in which the elicitation process takes place, and even the person who elicits the knowledge by interacting with the experts. |
| ksi.cpsc.ucalgary.ca /KAW/KAW96/martinez/Martinez.html (5818 words) |
|