| |
| | Dallas Willard ARTICLES |
 | | Natural selection is, according to Dawkins, "the blind watchmaker" (5, 37)--"blind because it does not see ahead, does not plan consequences, has no purpose in view" (21)--and this first stage of the argument is supposed to show that the watchmaker (really, the speciesmaker) is indeed blind. |
 | | As a result, when he says, "The basic idea of The Blind Watchmaker is that we don't need to postulate a designer in order to understand life, or anything else in the universe" (147; my italics), he has a "basic idea" that is nothing more that just bald assertion. |
 | | When he writes books like The Blind Watchmaker he is just a naturalist metaphysician, trying to cozy up to the scientists and blend into their company in such a way that his true colors will not be noticed. |
| www.dwillard.org /articles/artview.asp?artID=52 (6093 words) |
|