
	Where results make sense

Topic: Time Warner Entertainment

Related Topics

Time Warner

AOL Time Warner

WB Shield

Warner Communications

Entertainment Weekly

Nilpotent group

Merrie Melodies

Tad Morose

Elizabethan style

Xor linked list

Communications in Kiribati

Daffy Duck

MIT people

Clark University

Deaths in 2003

	Time Warner Entertainment v. USA, No. 96-5272 (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-10-16)
		Time Warner argues that both provisions facially—that is, no matter how sensitively or sensibly they might be implemented—violate the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States; the Commission argues the opposite.
		Time Warner does not argue that the Congress failed to identify an important governmental interest, but rather faults the Congress for having acted without having made findings, and without having evidence upon which it could have made findings, that either of these problems is a real one.
		In that case, we rejected Time Warner's argument that the leased access provision was a content-based restriction, and therefore subject to strict scrutiny, because nothing in the statute favored or disfavored speech on the basis of its content: "The statutory objective...
	www.fcc.gov /ogc/documents/opinions/2000/96-5272.html (3897 words)

	FindLaw for Legal Professionals - Case Law, Federal and State Resources, Forms, and Code
		Time Warner argues that the subscriber limits provision is a content-based restriction of its ability to communicate with its audience, and as such is subject to strict scrutiny.
		Time Warner is correct that the Court's acceptance of the must-carry obligation as content-neutral rested in large part upon the Court's understanding that the purpose of the statute was to maintain the availability of broadcast television for those without cable; that does not render Turner I wholly inapplicable, however.
		Time Warner argues that because the Congress expressed concern that cable operators might favor their affiliated pro- gramming services the legislature's "stated design was to suppress cable operators' speech," and to advance the speech of nonaffiliated programmers.
	laws.lp.findlaw.com /dc/965272a.html (4356 words)

	TIME WARNER ENTERTAINMENT v
		Time Warner's initial point regarding the leased access provisions n3 is that they [**28] should be subject to the most stringent of the standards used to evaluate restrictions on speech.
		Their qualification to lease time on those channels depends not on the content of their speech, but on their lack of affiliation with the operator, a distinguishing characteristic stemming from considerations relating to the structure of cable television.
		The problems Time Warner sees are elsewhere: there is first the lack of any demonstration that the leased access provisions address a real, non-conjectural harm; and there is second the loose fit between the remedy of setting aside a percentage of channel capacity and the supposed harm.
	academic.mu.edu /uglande/brec189/TimeWarner.htm (2372 words)

	Time Warner Ent. v. FCC, D.C.Cir. No. 97-1263
		Time Warner's primary response is that the issues it raises were directly implicated in the reasoning of our prior decision and were therefore covered in the remand order.
		Time Warner objects that this is a "post-hoc explanation," and argues that transition rate operators do have a gap, albeit a different one.
		Time Warner, however, contends that an operator using the transition rate faced a slightly different gap, one that began on April 1, 1993 instead of September 30, 1992, but likewise ended on the date the system first became subject to rate regulation.
	www.fcc.gov /ogc/documents/opinions/1998/timewrn2.html (5058 words)

	[No title]
		Petitioners Time Warner and AT&T challenge the horizontal limit as in excess of statutory authority, as unconstitutional infringements of their freedom of speech, and as products of arbitrary and capricious decisionmaking which violate the Administrative Procedure Act.
		Together with AT&T, Time Warner also challenges as arbitrary and capricious the rules for determining what counts as an "attributable interest." Con- cluding that the FCC has not met its burden under the First Amendment and, in part, lacks statutory authority for its actions, we remand for further consideration of both limits.
		As cable operators, Time Warner and AT&T "exercise[ ] editorial discretion in selecting the programming [they] will make available to [their] subscribers," Time Warner I, 211 F.3d at 1316, and are "entitled to the protection of the speech and press provisions of the First Amendment," Turner Broadcasting System, Inc. v.
	pacer.cadc.uscourts.gov /common/opinions/200103/94-1035a.txt (8845 words)

	Time Warner: Home
		Time Warner will report its first quarter 2007 results on Wednesday, May 2, 2007.
		Time Warner announced its first quarter 2006 results on Wednesday, May 3.
		Time Warner announced its first quarter 2005 results on Wednesday, May 4.
	www.timewarner.com (188 words)

	03-3005 -- Time Warner Entertainment Co. V. National Multihousing Council -- 08/27/2004
		Time Warner counters that, when read as a whole the license agreement is unambiguous and grants Time Warner a legally enforceable right to maintain all of its home run wires at The Atriums, regardless of whether the home run wires are currently in use by Time Warner to provide cable television to tenants.
		On appeal, Time Warner contests the district court's interpretation of the license agreement on three main grounds: (1) the agreement is unambiguous; (2) the clear language supports Time Warner's interpretation of the agreement; and (3) the district court's interpretation results in absurdity.
		Next, Time Warner argues that the district court's interpretation of the contract leads to absurdity in that the logical conclusion of its reading is that Time Warner's license vanishes each time a tenant moves out, a tenant cancels its subscription with Time Warner, or a tenant chooses a competing cable service.
	www.kscourts.org /ca10/cases/2004/08/03-3005.htm (7652 words)

	American Movie Classics Co. v Time Warner Entertainment, L.P. (2005 NY Slip Op 52081(U))
		Time Warner cross-moves, asserting that AMCC breached the unambiguous content clause since there has been a "material change" in the programming's "general quantity and quality." It also asserts that AMCC may not pursue its claim for damages in connection with its anticipatory breach claim, since it chose to continue performing under the contract.
		Time Warner asserts that the clause limits AMCC's programming throughout the term of the contract to the programming that AMCC actually provided at the time the contract was entered into, as set forth in the Representative Sampling.
		Time Warner also contends that material and substantial changes were made by AMCC with respect to its non-movie programming, and an even greater change took place within the category of "original" programming.
	www.courts.state.ny.us /reporter/3dseries/2005/2005_52081.htm (7749 words)

	AOL Time Warner Infocenter (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-10-16)
		At closing, Time Warner Cable Inc. is expected to have approximately $8.1 billion in consolidated net debt and preferred equity.
		Time Warner Cable Inc.'s cable television operations, which will include cable systems serving approximately 10.8 million subscribers, will be the world's most advanced, best-clustered cable television operations, with 93% of its customers in systems of 100,000 subscribers or more.
		AOL Time Warner Inc. is the world's leading media and entertainment company, whose businesses include interactive services, cable systems, filmed entertainment, television networks, music and publishing.
	media.aoltimewarner.com /media/x_press_view.cfm?release_num=55252700 (883 words)

	Time Warner Cable - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
		Time Warner Cable was formed in 1989 through the merger of Time Inc. 's cable television company, American Television and Communications Corp., and Warner Cable, a division of Warner Communications.
		On August 1, 2006, Time Warner Cable removed the NFL Network from its lineup in areas it gained from its deal with Comcast to jointly purchase bankrupt cable company Adelphia's assets and to swap certain areas it served with areas Comcast served.
		Time Warner Cable issued a petition to the FCC in an attempt to reverse the decision citing "severe, immediate and irreparable harm" to Time Warner Cable and its customers, and threatening legal action if the FCC did not reach a decision by 10am on August 7, 2006.
	en.wikipedia.org /wiki/Time_Warner_Cable (1729 words)

	Time Warner
		In 1996, approximately two-thirds of Time Warner's income came from the United States, but that figure is expected to drop to three-fifths by 2000 and eventually to less than one-half.
		Time Warner expects globalization to provide growth tonic; it projects that its annual sales growth rate of 14 percent in the middle 1990s will climb to over 20 percent by the end of the decade.
		Time Warner is also one of the largest movie theater owners in the world, with approximately 1,000 screens outside of the United States and further expansion projected.
	www.fair.org /index.php?page=1405 (657 words)

	TIME WARNER ENTERTAINMENT COMPANY L
		Time Warner appreciates the time and effort of the Policy Oversight Committee ("POC") that were undoubtedly necessary to develop the Guidelines.
		Time Warner suggests that this provision is not warranted by existing trademark law.
		Time Warner agrees that the submission of false or misleading application information constitutes bad faith, and expects that as a result of this provision, cybersquatters will no longer be able to hide behind aliases and false addresses.
	www.gtld-mou.org /rfc-subs/tw-98-01.htm (1497 words)

	FindLaw for Legal Professionals - Case Law, Federal and State Resources, Forms, and Code
		Petitioners Time Warner and ATandT challenge the horizontal limit as in excess of statutory authority, as unconstitutional infringements of their freedom of speech, and as products of arbitrary and capricious decisionmaking which violate the Administrative Procedure Act.
		Together with ATandT, Time Warner also challenges as arbitrary and capricious the rules for determining what counts as an "attributable interest." Con- cluding that the FCC has not met its burden under the First Amendment and, in part, lacks statutory authority for its actions, we remand for further consideration of both limits.
		Warner I: "the promotion of diversity in ideas and speech" and "the preservation of competition." Time Warner I, 211 F.2d at 1319; see also Turner I, 512 U.S. at 662-64 (conclud- ing that both qualify as important governmental interests).
	laws.lp.findlaw.com /dc/941035a.html (9654 words)

	Time Warner launches entertainment site \| CNET News.com
		Warner Bros. Online, which produces Entertaindom, was not immediately available for comment.
		Entertaindom is Time Warner's first major Web launch since it revamped its Internet strategy earlier this year.
		After Entertaindom, Time Warner plans to launch two more hubs: one focused on news, information and sports, and another focused on personal finance.
	news.com.com /2100-1023-233594.html (573 words)

	Time Warner Entertainment Lawsuit Attorney \| Lawyer Cable TV Subscribers' Privacy Violated
		The court certified the case as a class action on the claim for an injunction prohibiting Time Warner from further violations of the statute.
		However, the court ruled that the claims for damages could not be pursued in a class action, because the subscribers did not show that a class action was a superior method, compared to individual actions, to assert claims for monetary damages.
		Time Warner has since revised its privacy notice by including a warning that subscriber information may be disclosed for marketing purposes unless the subscriber opts out.
	www.lawcash.com /attorney/593/time-warner-entertainment-lawsuit.asp (719 words)

	Time Warner entertainment site to launch Monday \| CNET News.com
		Time Warner is expected to launch its much-awaited Entertaindom next week, a debut that will be the first indication of the giant's push to redefine its online strategy.
		Time Warner on Monday is expected to launch a much-awaited Web site promoting its entertainment programming, a debut that will be the first indication of the giant's push to redefine its online strategy.
		Warner Bros. is a division of Time Warner.
	news.com.com /2100-1023-233508.html (682 words)

	CNN.com - Entertainment - Time Warner cable pulls ABC stations in fee dispute - May 1, 2000
		Time Warner -- which is a sister company to CNN.com, a Time Warner Inc. property -- charged that the disruption was the fault of the Walt Disney Company, which owns ABC.
		Time Warner said it had no signed agreement allowing it to continue to carry the ABC signals.
		The spokeswoman said Time Warner is in violation of an FCC ruling that stations cannoot be dropped during a ratings "sweeps" period.
	www.cnn.com /2000/SHOWBIZ/TV/05/01/timewarner.abc (658 words)

	Time Warner Cable
		Time Warner Cable and Comcast have agreed to swap certain cable systems to enhance their respective geographic clusters of subscribers.
		These transactions between Time Warner Cable, Comcast and Adelphia are subject to customary regulatory review and approvals, including Hart-Scott-Rodino, FCC and local franchise approvals, as well as the Adelphia bankruptcy process, which involves approvals by the bankruptcy court having jurisdiction of Adelphia's Chapter 11 case and Adelphia's creditors.
		Time Warner Cable owns or manages cable systems serving 10.9 million subscribers in 27 states, which include some of the most technologically advanced, best-clustered cable systems in the country with more than 75% of the Company's customers in systems of 300,000 subscribers or more.
	www.timewarnercable.com /InvestorRelations/PressReleases/TWCPressReleaseDetail.ashx?PRID=492&MarketID=0 (2055 words)

	DCR Reaffirms Ratings on Time Warner Debt
		Time Warner's advanced cable infrastructure will provide a significant expansion of broadband distribution for AOL's on-line services and AOL's large subscriber base is expected to provide new opportunities to extend the reach of Time Warner's entertainment and communications brands into the digital environment.
		Time Warner is one of the largest and most broadly based media/entertainment companies in the world and the second largest cable MSO in the United States.
		Time Warner's ratings have stabilized at the current level as the company now utilizes free cash flow for share repurchases.
	www.prnewswire.com /cgi-bin/stories.pl?ACCT=104&STORY=/www/story/01-11-2000/0001112796&EDATE= (512 words)

	Time Warner and Comcast Complete Adelphia Communications Transactions; Comcast's Interests in Time Warner Cable ...
		Time Warner Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Dick Parsons said: "With Time Warner Cable delivering stellar growth, we are very pleased to continue to build value by significantly enhancing our scale, subscriber clusters, and operating efficiencies, all at an attractive price.
		Time Warner Cable expects that any shares distributed to Adelphia creditors pursuant to a plan of reorganization would be freely transferable.
		Time Warner Inc. is a leading media and entertainment company, whose businesses include interactive services, cable systems, filmed entertainment, television networks and publishing.
	www.redorbit.com /news/technology/596133/time_warner_and_comcast_complete_adelphia_communications_transactions_comcasts_interests/index.html?source=r_technology (1353 words)

	Time Warner Profile
		Time Warner's Cable Networks group, including Turner Entertainment's basic cable networks, CNN News Group and Home Box Office, includes many of the most valuable franchises in television news and entertainment.
		Time Warner's filmed entertainment group, consisting of Warner Bros. and New Line Cinema, is home to the world's most popular feature films, television programs and animation.
		This financial performance enabled Time Warner to use its increasing free cash flow and financial capacity to repurchase close to $2 billion of common stock in 1999, while continuing to invest in the growth of its businesses.
	www.bsu.edu /web/ADTAYLOR/profile.html (940 words)

	Huckabee v. Time Warner Entertainment Co. (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-10-16)
		Time Warner filed a Motion for Summary Judgment, which was denied by the trial court.
		In reaching its decision, the appellate court recognized that the case involved a public official, and therefore, Time Warner only had to negate the element of actual malice in order to prevail on its summary judgment motion.
		The brief argues that the court of appeals correctly held that Time Warner was entitled to summary judgment.
	www.naa.org /Government-and-Legal/Government-Affairs/First-Amendment/Huckabee-v.-Time-Warner-Entertainment-Co.-.aspx (401 words)

	Boston.com / Business / Case cast as villain in AOL-Time Warner debacle
		Almost from the moment the $175 billion combination was announced in January 2000, skeptics attacked the rationale behind the deal, a takeover of a fabled media giant by Case's AOL right at the peak of dot-com frenzy.
		And Case and former Time Warner CEO Gerald M. Levin, his opposite number in the deal, have resigned their posts with damaged reputations.
		Time Warner executives voice revulsion at the "gross creeps" of AOL invading their midtown Manhattan headquarters.
	www.boston.com /business/globe/articles/2003/08/31/case_cast_as_villain_in_aol_time_warner_debacle?mode=PF (659 words)

	Time Warner: Time Inc.
		With approximately 130 titles worldwide that lead in nearly all of the most popular consumer categories, Time Inc. is the leading magazine publisher in the U.S. and U.K. It is well positioned to continue to leverage its superior brands to deliver growth as well as to build and acquire attractive new businesses.
		Time Inc. magazines are read 340 million times each month worldwide by 173 million adults over18 years of age.
		Time Inc.’s growth strategy is built around a formula that has served it well: extending the excellence of and reinventing its core magazines, continuing cost-management programs, launching new magazines and seamlessly managing acquisitions.
	www.timeinc.com (997 words)

	Six Flags Over Georgia LLP vs. Time-Warner Inc.
		AOL Time Warner hasn't yet paid the damages but could be forced to by a lower court before the Supreme Court decides whether to hear its appeal.
		Time Warner and its partners sold the Six Flags chain of theme parks in February 1998 to Premier Parks, an Oklahoma City-based amusement park operator, for $1.9 billion.
		TWE did retain a contract to manage the Six Flag theme parks, so although Time Warner kept diluting its ownership of the chain, it kept control of it as a business.
	sfog.playride.com /lawsuit.html (7470 words)

	Time Warner: Overview
		Time is a weekly news-magazine, aimed to serve the modern necessity of keeping people informed, created on a principle of complete organisation.
		Adelphia's assets were acquired by Time Warner Cable and Comcast in July 2006.
		There is no comprehensive study of Time Warner and readers are accordingly reliant on works that look at different parts of the empire or personalities.
	www.ketupa.net /time.htm (1973 words)

Try your search on: Qwika (all wikis)