| |
| | Medical Malpractice Tort Reform |
 | | Most bills in 2005 focused on traditional tort reform issues such as limits to noneconomic damage awards, the allocation of plaintiff attorney fees as a percentage of a damages award, expert witness standards, and the inadmissibility of apology statements by health care practitioners. |
 | | The 109th (2005-2006) Congress has seen the introduction of many federal bills on medical malpractice tort reform that operate under the premise that the states are not addressing medical liability reform, that focus solely on the litigation angle, and that ignore other relevant issues related to insurance and medical standards of care. |
 | | NCSL has policy opposing any federal legislation that preempts state regulation of medical malpractice tort law, especially in the areas of statutes of limitation, rules and standards of evidence, the drafting of pleadings, the awarding of attorney fees, and damages limits. |
| www.ncsl.org /standcomm/sclaw/medmaloverview.htm (1150 words) |
|